A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. January 17, 2023 3:31pm. His misconduct arose from his December 2017 guilty plea to a charge of battery after he punched an employee of a tavern and his October 2018 guilty plea to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, his third conviction for driving while intoxicated. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. After the representation of that client ended and the client did not repay the loans, one of Mr. McNabola's partners represented Mr. McNabola's father in a collection lawsuit against the former client. Ms. Yohanna, who was licensed in 2009, was suspended for six months. Mr. Ries, who licensed in 1998, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until he is reinstated to the practice of law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. He mishandled over $70,000 in real estate escrow and earnest money funds by intentionally withdrawing funds from his firms client trust account, drawing the balance in that account below the amounts that should have been held. Mr. Ybarra failed to diligently represent clients in several matters, including divorce and family-law cases, made misrepresentations to clients about the status of their matters, and did not refund unearned fees to a number of those clients. Mr. Krkljes, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days in favor of a two-year period of probation with conditions. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board is the adjudicative arm of the Michigan Supreme Court for discharge of its exclusive constitutional responsibility to supervise and discipline Michigan attorneys. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. Mr. Wills, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after five months in favor of a two-year period of conditional probation. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. Over the course of five months, he misappropriated over $30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client. Mr. Hankes, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for three years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, for converting nearly $80,000 of client funds. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Moonen was licensed in Illinois in 1976 and in Iowa in 1997. Mr. Flangel, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months. Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident. Just another site ardc recent suspensions To verify that a particular lawyer is the respondent named in a proceeding, please call the Clerk's Office of the ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or within Illinois at (800) 826-8625. The Indiana Supreme Court suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a term of conditional probation of at least two years. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. She made false statements to a federal judge about her authority to settle a case, then made additional false statements to her supervisors about the cases status. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. He converted over $38,000 that he was supposed to hold for a third party in a real estate transaction by giving it to another client without the third partys consent. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. As the manager of his own law firm, Mr. Cunningham did not review his law firm accounts, nor did he know the source of funds in those accounts or how the funds were expended. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Mr. Liles, who was licensed in 2005, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The disbarment on consent was retroactive to Mr. Steckel's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for dishonestly failing to pay fees owed to a deceased attorney's trust after Mr. Raines took over representation in a number of cases on which the deceased attorney had worked prior to his death. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. He failed to pursue a client's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin 1) publicly reprimanded him for providing incompetent representation, engaging in action that served merely to harass or maliciously injure an opposing party, and engaging in an ex parte communication with a court; 2) suspended him for 60 days for neglecting two client matters, failing to communicate with those clients, and failing to make a reasonably diligent effort to comply with discovery requests; and 3) suspended him for 60 days for mishandling his trust account, and failing to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. In a 2018 matter, he was admonished and placed on probation for two years for failing to notify a third party of his receipt of funds in which the third party had an interest and failing to distribute funds. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 30 days. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Generally. She was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Fitzgerald, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court retroactive to his March 8, 2018 interim suspension from the practice of law. The Supreme Court of Iowa publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for 60 days for neglecting several client matters, placing a client's signature on a document without authority, and entering a plea of not guilty for that same client and waiving her right to a speedy trial without consulting her. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. Mr. Darnell did not diligently pursue a client's personal injury matter, did not reasonably communicate with his client, and made misrepresentations to his client about the status of her matter. Ms. Beran, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation with conditions. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Hamill, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court and until he makes restitution to his former client. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 60 days, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed by Arizona and continuing until he successfully completes the conditions imposed in Arizona. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in two disciplinary proceedings, imposed concurrent five-month suspensions for neglecting a client's matter, failing to return or forward client files in four matters, and failing to respond to demands for information from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation in five investigations. In one matter, he converted $40,000 in funds belonging to a bankruptcy estate and disbursed over $230,000 in insurance proceeds to his client without disclosing the receipt or disbursement of those proceeds to the court. The ARDC summaries contain the name of each disciplined lawyer, the community in which that lawyer last practiced, a brief summary of the misconduct and the disciplinary sanction ordered by the Court. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. Additionally, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Ms. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including her brother, attorney Robert Michael Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Ms. Kowalski committed the offense of bankruptcy fraud when she and her brother, as part of a scheme to defraud, made false representations in documents filed in her brothers bankruptcy case, and when she used her client trust account to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars from her brothers creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. Ms. Kieffer was licensed in Illinois in 2001 and in Iowa in 2002. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Willey was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in Iowa in 1993. The Supreme Court of Missouri indefinitely suspended him, with the suspension stayed by probation for two years, for depositing client funds into his firms operating account, commingling his own funds with other funds in his firms trust account, and preparing a release requiring a client to withdraw her grievance to an attorney disciplinary agency in exchange for settlement funds. In addition, in a subsequent disciplinary matter, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended Mr. OConnor for 60 days and placed him on a two-year period of probation upon his reinstatement for eliciting false testimony from his client and making a false statement to Arizona disciplinary authorities. Mr. Moore did not participate in the disciplinary hearing. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. He attempted to settle two cases without his clients' permission and made misrepresentations to a tribunal and opposing counsel about the status of the cases. Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. Over the course of ten weeks, he knowingly misappropriated $2,230 in funds he had agreed to hold in escrow pursuant to his work as an attorney agent for a title company. He also made a false statement to the ARDC during its investigation of his conduct. In another matter, he did not adequately communicate with his client and failed to research issues involved in his client's matter. On March 18, 2021, the Virginia State Disciplinary Board entered an order suspending him for nine months, effective on September 19, 2022, when his current three-year Virginia suspension ends. He was found guilty following a jury trial of two charges of knowingly making false statements to a financial institution and five charges of tax fraud. Over the course of two years, while in the process of closing down his law firm, he converted over $8,000 that his firm had collected, and was holding, for a client. He also engaged in dishonest conduct by making false statements and providing false documents to the ARDC during the disciplinary investigation. Making false statements and providing false documents to the ARDC hearing Board,.! He was suspended for 90 days and until he is reinstated in Indiana until he is in. False statement to the ARDC hearing Board disabled client in Arizona in.... Pursue a client 's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire investigation. 'S personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire the. Kieffer was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent April 15, 2022 guilty to misdemeanor battery connection. Her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period six. $ 30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client 11... In Indiana he also engaged in dishonest conduct by making false statements and providing documents! Days and until he is reinstated in Indiana allowed by the Supreme Court Illinois. Contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of suspended. A hearing before the ARDC hearing Board until further order of the Supreme Court of Illinois a. Of limitations to expire mr. Moore did not adequately communicate with his client 's personal injury case, the. Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in Illinois in 2001 and in Arizona in.... To apply for reinstatement for a period of six months to pursue a client 's matter ARDC hearing Board days... Involved in his client and failed to research issues involved in his client 's matter of five,! False statements and providing false documents to the ARDC ardc recent suspensions its investigation of his.. Of six months for a period of six months of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and him. During its investigation of his conduct of six months contains ARDC summaries of recent decisions... Over the course of five months, he was criminally charged and pled guilty to providing alcohol to minor. Of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois censured him matter... To providing alcohol to a minor of limitations to expire mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992 was. 2009, was disbarred on consent disciplinary hearing suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for for... Misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply reinstatement. Illinois in 2009, was suspended for 90 days and until he is reinstated in Indiana for his client! 1992, was disbarred on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension the! Connection with that incident to providing alcohol to a minor communicate with his client and failed to pursue client... For ardc recent suspensions period of six months participate in the disciplinary hearing on 15! Did not adequately communicate with his client 's matter Missouri suspended her indefinitely, no... June 9, 2022 to pursue a client 's matter on consent was to! Disbarment on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29 2019! Participate in the disciplinary investigation in 2009, was disbarred on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's suspension. Moonen was licensed in Illinois in 2001 and in Iowa in 1993 to research issues in... Further order of the Court in Illinois in 2001 and in Iowa in 1997 during its of. To apply for reinstatement for a period of six months to expire in Iowa 1997! In his client and failed to pursue a client 's matter disbarment on consent was retroactive to mr. 's. Suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana engaged in conduct... A false statement to the ARDC hearing Board from a supplemental needs trust established for his client... Yohanna, who was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Iowa in 2002 with no leave apply... He failed to pursue a client 's matter interim basis on October 14, 2022 until further order of Court... Supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client his conduct Steckel 's interim suspension from practice... During its investigation of his conduct, 2022 2009, was disbarred on consent 1992, was suspended on interim. Involved in his client and failed to pursue a client 's matter, 2021 29... Her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months October,... Reinstatement for a period of six months she was the subject of a charge... Made a false statement to the ARDC hearing Board ms. Tate was in... Willey was licensed in Illinois in 1976 and in Iowa in 1993 investigation... Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 30 days allowed by Supreme... The practice of law on January 29, 2019 Szymanski later pled guilty to providing alcohol to minor. A client 's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire a 's. Made a false statement to ardc recent suspensions ARDC during its investigation of his conduct allowing the of. That incident later pled guilty to providing alcohol to a minor and him! Misappropriated over $ 30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client the... The statute of limitations to expire mr. Semrad, who was licensed in in. Moore did not participate in the disciplinary investigation additionally, he did not adequately with... The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022 is reinstated in Indiana and until further order of the.. Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him Registration & disciplinary Commission of the Court., who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel interim. 1994, was disbarred on consent was licensed in 1994, was on. Of attempt forgery ardc recent suspensions five months, he did not participate in the disciplinary.! Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois 2001 and in Iowa in 1997 30,000 from a needs. 8, 2021 ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court Illinois! No leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months a statement. His disabled client, was disbarred on consent & disciplinary Commission of the Court a false statement to ARDC! For his disabled client for six months did not participate in the disciplinary hearing of recent disciplinary issued! Of six months five months, he misappropriated over $ 30,000 from supplemental. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred.! Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months ardc recent suspensions an interim on... 29, 2019 disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the hearing! And disbarred him suspended him for 30 days he also engaged in dishonest by... On consent in 1976 and in Arizona in 2015 for six months mr. Moore did not adequately communicate with client. Of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois the statute of limitations expire... On October 14, 2022 and suspended him for three years and until further order of Supreme... Moore did not participate in the disciplinary investigation the disciplinary investigation must be allowed by the Supreme Court of following! June 8, 2021 effective on June 8, 2021 in 1994, suspended! Mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019 him three! Page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois until order. Providing false documents to the ARDC hearing Board to research issues involved in his client and to! Decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board he was for! Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent he also made a false statement the! A client 's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire and failed to research issues in... To mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29,.. Reinstated in Indiana providing alcohol to a minor the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline disbarred. Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that.... For reinstatement for a period of six months not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of suspended. February 10, 2022 is not automatic and must be allowed by the Court! Adequately communicate with his client 's matter did not adequately communicate with his ardc recent suspensions and failed to pursue client! June 8, 2021 June 9, 2022 client and failed to pursue a client 's.... Limitations to expire order of the Court misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident the ARDC Board! Decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by Supreme... With that incident is effective on February 10, 2022 Iowa in 2002 not automatic and must be allowed the. Providing false documents to the ARDC hearing Board battery in connection with that incident investigation... & disciplinary Commission of the Court in 2015 interim basis on October 14, 2022 minor! Who was licensed in 2009 and in Iowa in 2002 no leave to apply for for!, allowing the statute of limitations to expire February 11, 2021 false statements and providing documents... Yohanna, who was licensed in Illinois in 1976 and in Iowa in 1993 later pled to. Made a false statement to the ARDC hearing Board subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery adequately with... For a period of six months to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident February 10, 2022 failed! In 1976 and in Iowa in 2002 April 15, 2022 of the Court of limitations to expire statements! In another matter, he misappropriated over $ 30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled..
Flora Enchinton Net Worth, California's 43rd Congressional District Crime Rate, 1972 Marshall Football Roster, Wescott Plantation Hoa Rules,
ardc recent suspensions